Chat Toronto Girlfriends asking for ID now?

[MalikFarush]

My dear friend, I used the figure of 12.5k to quantify the worth of my contributions in the industry and community. After all, it is easy to read one of my reviews and see an escort then you can decide if my review is true or not. In actuality, that is probably 1/5 of what I have spent, but you have to realize that most of the other people here are probably not even hobbyists and just troll online unlike you and me. I don't expect them to get it, but if the real people that matter get it, that is good enough for me. I hope we can influence other newer members of the community to not follow in the misogynists' footsteps of some of the outspoken members of the online escort community because not every client wants to treat escorts like shit.

Note, not one of the Einsteins in this thread has actually addressed my post about safety at massage parlors, and we are on a website about massage parlors.

Fuck off. Dumb motherfucker crossover from the fucking Asian piece of shit board.

 

[Frank Underwood]

No one's responded because no one disagrees that sex workers are entitled to safety. What's in dispute is whether a particular actor is concerned about that or is leveraging that anxiety for their own ends. Given his reputation among the workers you're apparently deeply concerned for, it's a valid concern.

I am glad that this forum does not excessively moderate, lock threads, deletes posts, or bans people for conversing taboo topics. On T*RB a thread about racism was started off a post I made and it was deleted. Each time the discussion about agency screening has been started, it ends abruptly by the hands of the mods/owners of the board.

Contrary to what conspiracy theorists, and dullards will have you believe, nobody can control what is posted on TERB. Most certainly not me. Boy, am I excited to have a platform where I can call out the misogynists, and hammer them with relentless logic and overwhelming evidence. I know it will fly over their heads, but I am not aiming at them.

@felixami tried to put forward the same ideas but was overwhelmed by retarded rhetoric, so let's try to have this discussion again.

If you feel that girls have the right to protections, why are you opposed to EMTs and other forms of screening?

And please, don't fall back on trying to chastise TGF for what some moron claims. I couldn't care about TGF, if they want to defend themselves then they can come on here. I am interested in the subject matter at hand. Let's put the conspiracy theories aside and try to stick with facts.

So what is it that rubs you the wrong way about agencies trying to protect their girls?

Do you know the difference between privacy and anonymity? Please tell me what it is.

 

[imthedude]

I'm not opposed to screening that is performed by a good faith actor, which I was quite clear about in my last post. If you struggled with parsing a post that short, I have my doubts that engaging with your query is going to be a useful exercise for either of us.

 

[Frank Underwood]

I'm not opposed to screening that is performed by a good faith actor, which I was quite clear about in my last post. If you struggled with parsing a post that short, I have my doubts that engaging with your query is going to be a useful exercise for either of us.

Your rhetoric was already pre-emptively addressed in my response, I said leave the drama and conspiracy out of it. Can you answer my question about privacy and anonymity?

 

[imthedude]

It's not drama and conspiracy unless you regard the best arbiter of the autonomy and safety of sex workers to be agency owners and not workers themselves. Despite this, i did answer your question, so I mean, I'm starting to wonder if a learning disability is at fault.

 

[BIGCORN]

here we go again...

 

[Frank Underwood]

It's not drama and conspiracy unless you regard the best arbiter of the autonomy and safety of sex workers to be agency owners and not workers themselves. Despite this, i did answer your question, so I mean, I'm starting to wonder if a learning disability is at fault.

You may be right about escort agencies not being the best arbiter of the autonomy and safety of sex workers, but are clients any better? Particularly obviously misogynistic clients like some of the ones that come forth to defend anonymity, or to put themselves on the same level as a vulnerable woman demanding to see their ID.

Are you suggesting these people make better arbiters?

On the other hand, if you are defending the autonomy of women, wouldn't you say that a woman choosing to work at an agency would grant some authority on the matter of safety to the agencies? is that (the safety) not part of the reason why girls go to agencies instead of doing it on their own?

I ask you again, can you explain to me the difference between anonymity and privacy?

 

[imthedude]

I'm not presenting a choice between clients and agency owners, though. The other party is a multitude of SWs who regard the guy you're going to bat for as an opportunist and an exploiter. You are welcome to keep trying to reframe the discussion but my position remains the same. In any case if you are honest about worker safety as manifested in deposits and screening, and feel that spas do an inadequate job of this one wonders why you continue to frequent them. Again you'd get meaningful responses if you weren't transparent in your intelectual dishonesty.

 

[Frank Underwood]

I'm not presenting a choice between clients and agency owners, though. The other party is a multitude of SWs who regard the guy you're going to bat for as an opportunist and an exploiter. You are welcome to keep trying to reframe the discussion but my position remains the same. In any case if you are honest about worker safety as manifested in deposits and screening, and feel that spas do an inadequate job of this one wonders why you continue to frequent them. Again you'd get meaningful responses if you weren't transparent in your intelectual dishonesty.

But when you are attacking one of the agencies that is trying to make a change, you really are presenting a choice. I can understand you don't like TGF, I am not here to give any mind to rumors and hearsay. There is other agencies that are adopting EMT deposits for screening. GOE, Barbie House, Your Booking Assistant, PLXTO, Xiao E (asian only), and probably others I don't know of. Your position on TGF can remain the same, now can you answer me what is the difference between anonymity and privacy?

 

[spassky]

… trying 2 find a puppy… sounds gd! Gonna use that one…

Accountant: “Hey? What’s this on the VISA, Barbiehouse69?”

“Oh, I was trying 2 buy a puppy on Kijiji”
“ Can I write that off as biz expense?”’

“Guard dog, sure…”.

You should be writing for television

 

[imthedude]

But when you are attacking one of the agencies that is trying to make a change, you really are presenting a choice. I can understand you don't like TGF, I am not here to give any mind to rumors and hearsay.

I'm criticizing the agency's intentions, and questioning your sincerity because you are deeply invested in protecting their reputation, to the extent that you continue to place more weight on their word against that of, again, the people whose safety you claim is the central issue in this discussion.

 

[Frank Underwood]

I'm criticizing the agency's intentions, and questioning your sincerity because you are deeply invested in protecting their reputation, to the extent that you continue to place more weight on their word against that of, again, the people whose safety you claim is the central issue in this discussion.

You don't like TGF, we get it. Everyone has heard you say it many times. Let's move on past that now. Are you a sex worker? No, then stop putting words in their mouths. Not one sex worker has come in here to back up your claims.

You want to question my sincerity? I sincerely want you to explain to me the difference between anonymity and privacy.

Can you stop dodging the question?

 

[Zeroseven]

You don't like TGF, we get it. Everyone has heard you say it many times. Let's move on past that now. Are you a sex worker? No, then stop putting words in their mouths. Not one sex worker has come in here to back up your claims.

You want to question my sincerity? I sincerely want you to explain to me the difference between anonymity and privacy.

Can you stop dodging the question?

Not relevant. The practice is unnecessary and intrusive.

 

[Avoid_SeductionSpa_RipOff&STDs]

these ladies are vulnerable
how else are they to feel protected?
i applaud the agency for taking important methods to create a safer workplace
other agencies don't give a shit

They're fucking whores for fucks sakes

 

[Avoid_SeductionSpa_RipOff&STDs]

not sure how showing an ID would make them more protected in this situation...but OK. I guess new customers considering TGF should beware. Kind of a scummy business practice asking me for ID AFTER I paid the deposit.

They aint gonna give you your $ back so you did the right thing to post about it here. By doing so and warning everyone the possible drop off in business for them will be worth it.

 

[Avoid_SeductionSpa_RipOff&STDs]

You don't like TGF, we get it. Everyone has heard you say it many times. Let's move on past that now. Are you a sex worker? No, then stop putting words in their mouths. Not one sex worker has come in here to back up your claims.

You want to question my sincerity? I sincerely want you to explain to me the difference between anonymity and privacy.

Can you stop dodging the question?

STFU this forum is built on free speech. We as a community can break you by not spending our $ there. Up to you

 

[Avoid_SeductionSpa_RipOff&STDs]

sex workers get attacked
they need protection

They're whores. Treat them as such

 

[imthedude]

You don't like TGF, we get it. Everyone has heard you say it many times. Let's move on past that now. Are you a sex worker? No, then stop putting words in their mouths. Not one sex worker has come in here to back up your claims.

You want to question my sincerity? I sincerely want you to explain to me the difference between anonymity and privacy.

Can you stop dodging the question?

No one owes you anything, bud, especially a dishonestly framed discussion. I'm not interested in defending positions that I obviously do not hold, and I'm especially not interested in trying to help a self-deluding debate bro earn a gotcha.

 

[Toomanymiles]

The gorilla pimps don’t wanna be out gorilla pimped.

 

[Frank Underwood]

No one owes you anything, bud, especially a dishonestly framed discussion. I'm not interested in defending positions that I obviously do not hold, and I'm especially not interested in trying to help a self-deluding debate bro earn a gotcha.

Right, gotcha.