I thought the original question was 'SHOULD a massage hurt' thereby implying that UNLESS it hurt it wouldn't work
No wonder there are so many 'butchers' out there if that's what they are being told [
]
"even with correct use, friction is a painful technique that MAY cause bruising, and it is worth advising the patient of this at the time".
NOTE the word MAY
The good therapist is one who can deliver the most effective treatment with the LEAST amount of DISCOMFORT (I try to avoid using the word pain ).
Too many 'therapists' (sic) seem to think that the more it hurts the better they are doing (and I've seen more than a few over the last 11+ years)
Yes some treatments, by their v nature are going to be 'uncomfortable' (note that word again , however the therapist should not take this as a green light to give as much pain as they can. ('Some pain is good, so more pain must be better' approach )
I totally agree with Richard though in
"With these I tend to use trigger point therapy in one or two areas, just to make them happy, because they are not happy psychologically with the treatment, then its not going to be as effective" (and I thought I was the only one )
However the statement regarding the client signing some form of 'disclaimer' to try and absolve responsibilty ie:
'If any client did want to seek legal action after being advised of this, then they would get nowhere'
......is wishful thinking (I have had more than a few discussions with litigation lawyers regarding this)
You cannot sign away your rights no matter what is written on the form
If you want the legalise
'Informed consent' cannot overrule 'Duty of care'