I'm not arguing against draping. Once I'm on the table, of course I expect to be draped, and I hope that the fellow student working on me is learns to do effective and efficient draping, as do I when our positions are reversed.
I just don't plan on squiggling out of my clothing on top of a table.
If my school has changing facilities, so be it, but if a class of 20 is queueing up for 2 changing booths, it seems like an awful waste of time.
Once again, I am not arguing against draping.
But in a classroom environment, with a bunch of other (presumably) somewhat mature grown-ups, who are entering a profession where they not only have to see, but also touch, 98% of the body area of possibly thousands of human beings of both genders over decades, and who will more than likely end up seeing, from time to time, that last 2%, it makes absolutely no sense to me that such people should cling to hangups they may have about the human body. To express shock, moral outrage, disgust, or disdain for that 2% is to perpetuate the myth that those areas are somehow "dirty" or "shameful".
That said, let me argue in favor of draping:
Draping serves a number of very valid purposes:
1) As you mentioned, it is a major differentiation point between legitimate Massage Therapy and Prostitution.
2) It helps to set clear boundaries on the relationship between MT and client.
3) It acknowledges that although the MT may not have any hangups about that 2%, the client most likely does (in the U.S. culture).
4) Going beyond the 2%, draping serves to keep the client comfortably warm.
5) It is the law in many states and jurisdictions.
6) It is required by the code of ethics of several certifying boards.
It may serve the purpose of sparing the MT discomfort arising from their own hangups about that 2%, but I really think that is the weakest of all these purposes mentioned.
So please do not accuse me of arguing against draping as an important Standard Operating Procedure for MTs.
Thank you,
Kevin