Review: No excitement with Kelly at Red Rose

[Djanti]

Date: 1/25/12 - Noon
Provider: Kelly
Phone: 972-556-2900
Email Address: -
URL / Website: -
City: Dallas
State: Texas
Address: NW Hwy
Appointment Type: Spa
Activities: Half-Hearted TS, DATY, BBBJ, ACG, Mish
Session Length: 60
Fee: $$
Hair Length and Color: Long, Black
Age: 30+
Smoking Status: Smoker
Nationality: Korean
Physical Description: Average face, but looks aged, attractive spinner body with MM B's, small patch of fur at the target area, maybe 5'4", 110 lbs
Recommendation: No

 

[joeyharrington2002]

 

[Dream Girl]

Intereseting...

 

[mechvegas]

I've never had a session with Kelly, but what you experienced may be an early sign of burn out - or, it may be YMMV?



K.

 

[ikenna]

My guess is that it was nothing personal and that she was just tired or having a rough day. Still, it sounds like she was very accomodating given you gave her a "no."

 

[Feriouse]

Yep. It is not You. It is her. She's either burned out or super tired. I am an ugly-mon and i had an unforgettable full of energy session from her.

Best luck in your next adventure.

 

[Just-Me]

 

[ginalynnacp]

Being the flavor of the month has its drawbacks.

 

[bettermade]

 

[JeremyR]

L.A.:

+1 on that.

TG

 

[Dawn S]

 

[Scarlette Starr]

Thank you L.A.

 

[SecuritySupportAV]

Oppa, that's the beauty of reviews, considering the good reviews against the bad reviews before you see someone. Paraphrasing you, In your mind, since she performed the services she should automatically get a Yes. Well in my mind, I think if someone is going through the motions with no passion, totally zoned out, not into the session, they should get a No without being frowned upon. And since I was writing the review, I called it the way I saw it. And even though I'm a lying, cheating, SOB, I want to try to be honest in my reviews. (I know, what a contradiction in ethics)

 

[Muayad Q]

And therein lies the dichotomy. Regardless of the contents of a review, the final word is Yes or No; all or nothing.

Disclaimer - I don't want to be hypocritical here because I've been known to flame OP's for less than stellar reviews of certain girls whom I'd seen. Would my comments be different if I had seen Kelly? I'd like to think not, but they probably would be, because like it or not, we all have some WK in us.

That being said...........

I don't have a problem with the No recommendation on this review because I was able to see the whole thing and understood that the OP would not go see her again based on his experience. Would I go see her based on this review? - of course, without a doubt because one No recommendation does not necessarily pass judgement on a girl of Kelly's repute. Were this the first review of a new girl - I don't know; I may have to wait for a few more reviews because I need that IOP.

I think it took balls to give a No recommendation and I'm sure the OP considered it for a long time (maybe not). Whether it was warranted is another matter. I just understand that the OP won't see her again, but I'm sure it did nothing to tarnish her reputation, especially among those who have already seen her. That's the beauty of this forum; you read the reviews; you do the research; you make your decision and then you "buys your ticket and you takes your chances". Sometimes it works, sometimes it doesn't.

I can tell you this - I've seen many AMP legends currently on the scene who I won't go back to see; but I won't write a review because I know the shit storm it would cause if I gave them a No recommendation. I don't know who's to blame for the mediocre sessions I had with some girls, I just know that you can't click with every girl 100% of the time. So rather than try to rationalize why certain things happened or didn't happen during a session, I cut my losses and go elsewhere. There are way too many great girls out there to agonize over one bad/mediocre session.

One more thing - sometimes I think we'd be better off without the recommendation block. Everything you need to make a decision is in the ROS.

K.

 

[tazman111]

+1 for many reasons, one of which is that it would discourage lurkers looking for free information and encourage more people to (1) register as members and (2) write a review to gain ROS.



Hey I am definitely not flaming you. In fact, quite the opposite, I'm glad you took the time to write a review and give your opinion. Whether or not I "disagree" with your overall recommendation in terms of what a yes or no should mean, your experience was your own and you chose to take the time to share it. I do feel badly that you didn't have the IOP because as heejoman stated, Kelly can bring the IOP when she is feeling well and on top of her game. But I'm still jealous you had the MSOG lol.

 

[jerry]

Very good discussion on this thread. I should have elaborated on my original comment in more detail but I applaud the review. I think I was just surprised.

I believe there is too much weight put in the yes or no (by us and the providers). As said, the valuable info is in the ROS.

A "no" seems to have taken on a meaning of something gone terribly wrong, where it really could be something as simple as an "off" session by a good provider or a lack of chemistry.

I think most of us are guilty of giving a yes, while knowing we will never return. More honest criticism would benefit all but it's difficult to embrace. A first "no" given to a normally good provider with all "yes" reviews would cause a shit storm!

 

[Jackie M]

Absolutely because the spas and the girls can't see the reason for the "no" review (nor am I advocating that they should). And guys that have their favorite girls don't like to see them with a "no" review because it usually attaches a stigma, hurts the girl's business, and thus her chances of sticking around.

That's why I think Kimchi is right in stating that the recommendation line be abolished. Let the ROS stand on its own. Those that complain about it can write a review or pay the subscription fee and get in on what's going on.



I don't know about a shit storm but in this case it's caused good discussion. Kelly has had consistently "yes" reviews. When I first saw her, the reviews stood up to my experience and I added a "yes" review. This is one of her first if not her first "no" so I think a discussion was appropriate IMHO.

 

[Pompal 09.]

Kelly is a doll. Charming, happy and a sueforum.xxx GFE experience.

MY RECOMMENDATION: YES

My mileage has only increased as time and visits progressed. I hope she takes a well deserved vacation soon.

 

[lark]

Maybe we should start a protest movement - LOL

Like some guys do (myself included) in the Activities block - See ROS

We could do the same thing for the Recommendation block - See ROS

Only problem with that is that you have to submit the review and go back in and edit. Lot of guys don't know how or won't take the time.

Definitely food for thought though.

Good - Bad - Indifferent - Kelly is definitely getting mileage out of this review.

Like everything in the hobby - YMMV - LOL

K.

 

[??A Sohma at heart!??]

if you would just get the dog's name right kimchi!

but seriously folks...i can't think of a single very popular amp girl, past or present, that hasn't gotten an occasional bad-to-mediocre review (except maybe cindy). it happens. there's the ymmv thing, chemistry, WALDT, bad days etc. and as kimchi said...there is a little WK in all of us. I think kelly is one of the best amp girls going right now, my definite best session of the year so far. it was hard for me to believe she got a NO rec...but i read it and didn't flame the OP or anything. i was a bit puzzled by it after reading the ROS, and i will publicly state that i really like kelly, but hey. a good hobbiest will do the research, take the good with the bad, and make his own decision. i have no problem with the review at all.

but i know i will see her again. there's just something about her i like.

JPdM

btw...does anybody else see the letter 'y' with a freaky line in the middle? this just started today.