very well put Dave x
Its like IHM, when narendra mehta first devised it - it was a cobbled together version of what he had experienced. if you went over to India and asked for IHM they probably wouldn't know what you were asking for.
I've seen the clip of Cosmic head massage and that is no way anything near an IHM imo.
I learnt IHM from Helen Mcguiness when it first came out, at the time only Helen and Mehta were teaching it.
I know have been shown 4 versions of IHM, and it is nothing like what I was originally taught.
I have done 2 Indonesian massage courses, both quite different.
I've learnt Ayurvedic therapies from one person, a Doctor from Kerala, what he was teaching was "his version" of massage, doesn't mean that that is the only way to do it.
Diffferent regions have different styles of massage.
I note that thai massage is often advertised as a region of learning.
If you booked a swedish massage in 4 different places you would get differing treatments.
I have done 2 courses in Lomi lomi so far and know there is so much more to learn hence wanting to learn more.
I've studied 4 different ways of doing Thai foot massage, all have merits.
Its the therapists intention that is important, yes I agree.
yes, all types of massage have been blended into each other. We say Egyptians, Chinese and Indian massage borrow from each other to then lend themselves to other types of massage. India and Tibetan techniques are similar, and why?
Indonesian massage is similar to Thai, and why?
From the ebook and emails that I receive from Nancy, there doesnt seem to be any animosity. I have learnt from someone from Hawaii, but the other 2 tutors are from the UK. That doesn't affect me in any way.
I have learnt most of my therapies from British people. Not by insisting on it, but because I haven't gone to Thailand to learn a version of it, India to learn a regions version of massage, etc etc etc.