oxejxuxviqwidoelk
New Member
I booked a massage from a mobile therapist during the week. She was a lovely, friendly girl and seemed very professional (she took a full history before starting the massage).
In the history, I filled in the space where it asked about any problem areas - I mentioned that my upper back, neck and shoulders were extremely sore and tight. So there was me with high hopes that she would help with these problems......
....it didn't happen! Sigh. The massage was light-to-medium (even though I had asked for deep and firm). And there was no difference in pressure when she reached my 'sore bits'. In fact, she barely did ANY work at all around my upper traps, levator scapulae and rhomboids.
My first thought was "what was the point of taking a history if you blatantly ignore the points mentioned in it?". My second thought was "oh well, that's another ยฃ40 wasted for what has amounted to little better than a 'gentle tickle' ".
I've now started to think that my ideal massage - ie one that addresses areas of tension and actually manages to unlock tight muscles, one that includes the glutes and doesn't stop two-thirds of the way up the thigh and one that doesn't cost an exhorbitant amount - isn't going to happen. LOL!
Am I being too hard and expecting too much from a swedish massage? I think maybe the fact that I've continued my study and training beyond my swedish qualification makes me expect that other therapists have done the same thing.
I had a "deep tissue" massage from someone recently and it turned out (after some subtle questioning) that they had got their massage qualification on a one-week course - and worse still - they DID NOT have an anatomy & physiology qualification (she said the course didn't require it!). Her massage was basically an hour of effluerage. There's no way it could even have been described as a firm pressure swedish - let alone a deep tissue!
OK, I need a massage after all that ranting!!! LOL!
Kitten
x
In the history, I filled in the space where it asked about any problem areas - I mentioned that my upper back, neck and shoulders were extremely sore and tight. So there was me with high hopes that she would help with these problems......
....it didn't happen! Sigh. The massage was light-to-medium (even though I had asked for deep and firm). And there was no difference in pressure when she reached my 'sore bits'. In fact, she barely did ANY work at all around my upper traps, levator scapulae and rhomboids.
My first thought was "what was the point of taking a history if you blatantly ignore the points mentioned in it?". My second thought was "oh well, that's another ยฃ40 wasted for what has amounted to little better than a 'gentle tickle' ".
I've now started to think that my ideal massage - ie one that addresses areas of tension and actually manages to unlock tight muscles, one that includes the glutes and doesn't stop two-thirds of the way up the thigh and one that doesn't cost an exhorbitant amount - isn't going to happen. LOL!
Am I being too hard and expecting too much from a swedish massage? I think maybe the fact that I've continued my study and training beyond my swedish qualification makes me expect that other therapists have done the same thing.
I had a "deep tissue" massage from someone recently and it turned out (after some subtle questioning) that they had got their massage qualification on a one-week course - and worse still - they DID NOT have an anatomy & physiology qualification (she said the course didn't require it!). Her massage was basically an hour of effluerage. There's no way it could even have been described as a firm pressure swedish - let alone a deep tissue!
OK, I need a massage after all that ranting!!! LOL!
Kitten
x