Hi Paul,
yes massage is a fantastic profession to be in, however when we have one and two day practitioner level courses, legitimised by the QCF and awarding organisations allowing them to run, is there any wonder why insurance companies and the like dont want to know us?
With all due respect to you, if you think GCMT are going to lead massage out of this pit, you are mistaken. I said this to them privately when I was part of GCMT, and I say it publicly now that I am out of it...its a dead duck. It has no leadership, no admin, no expertise, no finances, and more importantly, no will to get anything done. For years I have asked them to deal with the problem of DL massage courses, one and two day practitioner workshops, and nothing was done. Now that another of its leading PAs has left, its even more sunk. It does need to update its website to see who actually is left there (if they can get someone who knows how to update it).
Im off to London today to see what can be done about these courses that make a mockery of our profession, and guess what, I have had not one jot of support from GCMT, there is no-one there to deal with anything anymore. IMO SMA should have come to SRTC, and I hope that you still do.
GCMT was once a fantastic lead body, it was instrumental in pushing for regulation, it had a fantastic team who were really getting things done, and them..........BAM, new chair, new rules, out with the old, and in with the....no-one, nothing.
Im sorry to turn this into a rant Paul, but I spent many years working hard for GCMT, along with some great colleagues, only to watch it turn to ****.
Maybe SMA can turn them around, but I honestly doubt it, you are focused on sports massage, and I fear that unless I can get a positive result today, massage is going to go down the pan, with more and more of these 2 day practitioner level courses starting up (incidentaly, I stopped checking when I had two full A4 sheets of schools running these QCA quals, thats a heck of a lot of schools churning them out!)